Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0932

reference
962-tree-1
name
0932
tree-preservation-order

undefined

962-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.014597 50.850949)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.014540 50.850943,-1.014543 50.850954,-1.014551 50.850964,-1.014563 50.850972,-1.014579 50.850977,-1.014596 50.850979,-1.014614 50.850978,-1.014630 50.850973,-1.014642 50.850965,-1.014651 50.850955,-1.014654 50.850944,-1.014651 50.850933,-1.014643 50.850922,-1.014631 50.850914,-1.014615 50.850909,-1.014598 50.850907,-1.014580 50.850909,-1.014564 50.850914,-1.014551 50.850922,-1.014543 50.850932,-1.014540 50.850943)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL